1st Physics - "1F" / "Owners"

"The Owner" (1st Phys.) 

In the crowd, the "proprietor" is visible from afar, he is the brightest and most conspicuous figure. The "proprietor" is distinguished first of all by his power and abundance of forms, his height, and the richness of his facial sculpture. Usually he is handsome, but even if he is not, the "proprietor" is said to be "many" (it is not without reason that Kretschmer called him an "athlete" in his typology). 

The mighty build of the "proprietor" is not the law; I have come across rather small individuals among them. But still, tall, burly people prevail among the 1st Physicists. And this is no accident. If the reader remembers, one of the main attributes of the First Function is redundancy, so it is natural that the 1st Physicist should have redundant flesh. 

However, this excess does not become obvious, visible right away. Externally, a "possessive" child does not differ from his peers. Usually he is thin, built, with long legs. The first external signs of 1st Physique begins to show with the beginning of puberty: shoulders and hips are expanding, buttocks are becoming flat, facial features are getting bigger and juicier, lips take an unusually sexy bowed, kissing shape. 

By the end of the process of puberty, the rapid flowering of the 1st Physique reaches its climax. Girls, with a thin waist, acquire steep, ace worm-shaped hips, lush shoulders, and mighty firm breasts. Young men are made broad-boned, shouldered, muscular, and hairy. There is still little fat on the body of the "proprietor," the skin is clean and brightly pigmented, as they say, "blood with milk." A thick, lush cap of hair enhances the attractiveness of the image. 

Unfortunately, the riotous beauty of the 1st Physique does not last long: in women until the first birth, in men until the age of thirty. After this threshold there is a sharp metamorphosis, which for the first time visibly shows the excessiveness of the flesh of the "proprietor". Overnight the weight increases by 20-30%, the waist disappears, the belly bulges, the body begins to overgrow with fat. 

At first the increased fullness does not embarrass the 1st Physicist much, and even on the contrary, with its appearance it becomes as if adequate to itself, because the former purely psychological feeling of the excessiveness of its bodily beginning finds its direct physical expression. The "proprietor" begins to worry only when his weight exceeds a certain "excessive norm" which he himself has set. But a belated fight against obesity rarely yields a positive result; laziness and the habit of abundant food do their work, deforming the appearance of the 1st Physicist further and further. 

The early and booming 1st Physique in general tends to blossom just as early and just as booming. The body is quickly covered with folds, the breasts and buttocks sag. The skin loses its brightness and then darkens. The eyes become a little rolled up. The kissing roll on the upper lip disappears, and the lower lip begins to sag and turn outward in the corners of the mouth. The hair turns gray early, and in men, often worse, a rapidly expanding bald spot is revealed. 

Earlier than others, the 1st Physicist is hit by menopause and impotence. Suddenly there are diseases, first of all attacking joints and cardiovascular system. The source of these diseases is programmed in the very nature and psychology of the 1st Physique: overweight, passion for comfort, excess, laziness. Death of the "proprietor" is more often all taken as a result of lesions of the cardiovascular system. 

That, in brief, is the external, corporeal history of the 1st Phys. 

If it is not always possible to speak about the power and abundance of bodily forms as applied to the 1st Physique as a universal beginning, the peculiarities of its plastics are truly universal. "The "proprietor", if he is in no hurry, acts, speaking in Russian, "like a sheep," and in Indian, "with the gait of an elephant. The 1st Physicist, with her shoulders straightened, her belly protruding, her socks open and her feet slightly shuffling, moves along the street with the lazy grace of the 1st Physicist. In fact, she is not so much moving as she is flowing from one beautiful pose to another. In general, statics is somewhere inwardly closer to the "proprietor" than dynamics. He can stay in the same pose for hours without experiencing any noticeable discomfort. 

* * * 

Since ancient times, since the statues of Phidias and Praxiteles, the 1st Physique has established itself as the standard of human beauty in both form and proportion. I will not judge how objective such a standard really is, but I will only note that the 1st Physics attracted the artist's attention back at the moment when he first picked up a brush and clay, and the earliest human images that have come down to us from primitive times show, as a rule, the familiar excessive, appetizing forms of the "possessor". 

The ancient artists, who may not have had too refined, but in their own way healthy taste, cannot be denied a certain logic when they chose the 1st Physics as their model. The eye, seeing only the external, physical side of an object, involuntarily seeks that which most fully expresses this object and, preferably, with excess. And the appearance of the 1st Physics meets these requirements in the best way, showing the external side of the human being in excess. Here, I believe, is the main reason for its noticeable influence on the formation of the anthropological aesthetic ideal. 

Now artistic taste has changed, become subtler, and images of the nude 1st Physique have moved into such less prestigious spheres as kitsch and pornography. However, the number of their connoisseurs, recruited primarily from among the "proprietors" themselves, has not diminished. Rarely, even a deep, old man with the 1st Physics does not have somewhere stashed a card of a naked maiden with an immense butt and watermelon breasts. And that's understandable. Looking at such a card, the "proprietor" is not so much seduced as identified by seeing on it a young kindred being, both in body and spirit. 

Of course, the interest in appearance begins in the 1st Physicist with himself and accompanies him throughout his life, until the grave. Knowing what constitutes the most spectacular side of his nature, the "proprietor" deals with his appearance with full dedication until the end of his days: exposing everything that can be exposed (sometimes reaching into exhibitionism in this striving), emphasizing by covering clothes what cannot be exposed, abusing the brightest colors of makeup and the most tart perfumes. And let us not be too harsh on the 1st Physique for this - the unconscious demonstration of the redundancy of the First Function is peculiar to everyone - the only difference is what it is. 

Taking care of one's appearance, at the same time, does not prevent the "proprietor" from being very untidy and neglecting hygiene, especially in everyday life. And such bifurcation is quite understandable, because care about one's body in the 1st Physicist neighbors with absolute confidence in self-sufficiency and extreme goodness of her physical beginning, which does not require any embellishments in the home environment. "And so - good!" - the 1st Physicist lazily thinks, when it comes to soap and a comb, and, wrapped in a greasy robe, settles down on the chronically untidy bed. 

* * * 

Another reason that attracts both the artist and us mere mortals to the 1st Physics has a speculative nature and turns out to be a pure delusion. The fact is that the mighty loins of men with the 1st Physics, steep hips and full breasts of women are associated by an outside observer with the ability to abundant fertility (a thing that has not lost its significance to this day). This, however, is a mistake. No, men who are "possessive" have no trouble making babies, and women who are "possessive" endure childbirth more easily than anyone else. It is not a matter of physiology, but in the absence of an internal psychological attitude to abundant fecundity in the 1st Physicist. The "proprietor" has a poorly developed love of children, and, if it is his will, he can manage with one child. 

This paradox is explained by the effectiveness of the 1st Physics. Seeking more for the result than for the process, the "proprietor" subordinates his reproduction to this principle: one child is already a result, a result which once and for all certifies the fullness of the 1st Physics in terms of reproduction. And to replicate the same result, in fact, adding nothing to the previous one, is there any reason? Such or almost such a scheme scrolls in the subconsciousness of the 1st Physicist when the question of the second child arises. 

It is not without the effect of mental attitudes, either, when a male "possessor" suddenly discovers that he is impotent. In general, early impotence of the 1st Physique has two reasons: one is psychophysiological and the other is purely psychological. The first reason is that the tendency to excess and comfort in the 1st Physicist early begins to age the cardiovascular system. The heart fills up with fat, the walls of blood vessels grow up with salts and toxins. And as the man's potency entirely depends on the work of cardiovascular system, its premature withering by the 1st Physicist is easy to predict. In my opinion, only therapeutic fasting can save the situation, but it is this type of treatment that the "proprietor" accepts least of all, the very thought of temporary food refusal throws him into shock. 

Besides, impotence, if it occurs after the age of forty, does not embarrass the 1st Physicist much. And here the second is a psychological reason. Appreciating in sex not so much the process as the result, he treats the problem of potency accordingly. As long as his organism and experience allow him to raise the sexual bar higher and higher, the "proprietor" is the most reckless of lovers. But after the peak is passed, and the bar itself, without demand, begins to slide down, sex loses its sporting charm for the "proprietor," and after that the interest disappears as such. The time of the highest results is over, so is it worth trying any further? - ponders the 1st Physicist and thus involuntarily speeds up the process of shutting down his peristalsis. As the Hamburg sexopathologist Friedrich Koch wrote: "Whoever perceives sex as a 'sport of the highest achievements' also falls into decline sooner." 

The result is also the reason for some other specific features of the intimate life of the 1st Physicist. I think it is superfluous to say that her sex is powerful and plentiful. However, it is necessary to warn that it is contraindicated for partners with processional Physicists. Because "proprietary" sex is crude, mechanistic, economical, businesslike, monotonous, aimed at achieving the result (orgasm) as soon as possible, and almost indifferent to what precedes or follows this climax of pleasure. By analogy with the activity of any First Function, there is egoism, athleticism, a spirit of violence and competition (it is not without reason that the emperor Domitian called sex "bed wrestling"). 

The love action of the 1st Physicist is always monologic. Even when the partner manages to convince the "proprietor" to think not only about his own pleasure, but to somehow respond to the requests of the opposite party, he remains faithful to the monologue form of intimacy. The difference is that to the formula "I take," "I give," is added, but the dominant "I" remains unchanged; eroticism is not conceivable for the 1st Physique in such categories as "we," "dialogue," and "co-creation. 

Roughness, as already mentioned, is also an indispensable companion of the First Function and, consequently, of the First Physique. In the latter it is expressed in low receptivity, thick-skinnedness of sense organs (hearing, touch, smell, etc.) The "proprietor" is a sensory behemoth. And this circumstance also affects intimacy in its own way. First, the surface of the body of the 1st Physique is poor in both area and number of erogenous zones, which, of course, does not add excitement either to the "proprietor" or to his partners, and breeds laziness, sleepiness, and coldness in love. 

Second, women with the 1st Physique, especially childless women, often do not know what an orgasm is. And, apparently, the majority of women who, according to sexology, suffer from anorgasmia are "possessive" women. The reason given above is the thickskinnedness of the 1st Phys. 

The situation is not hopeless, though, I think. Sophia Andreyevna Tolstaya, for example, judging by her diaries, began to experience orgasm only when she was over thirty. And not her husband, I am sure, was the cause, although Tolstoy on the fervor of love, few could match. Most likely, Tolstoy was driven to orgasm by frequent childbirth and breastfeeding, which eventually thinned her bodily perception enough to achieve an extreme contraction of the so-called "orgastic cuff," which, according to doctors, causes orgasm in women. 

Third, thick-skinnedness relieves the "proprietor" of physiological jealousy. The key word here is "physiological" because, contrary to popular belief, jealousy is a complex, multifaceted feeling, and cheating is not always perceived as a blow to physics, and may, depending on the psychotype, not be perceived as a blow at all. So, due to thickskinnedness, the "proprietor" is not physiologically jealous, the knowledge that someone else enjoys the caresses of his permanent partner does not lead to physiological rejection, a sense of squeamishness, a feeling of inability to continue intimacy. In the case of adultery, if anything the "proprietor" is concerned about in terms of physics, it is the issue of sexual superiority over his rival and the right of superiority in possession, i.e. he is ready to put up with someone else running along his intimate path, as long as he runs behind him. 

To tell the truth, the "proprietor" himself cannot be classed as a model of fidelity either. However, it would not be very correct, due to the specific attitude to cheating, to attribute some natural amoralism to the 1st Physicist. The nature of "possessive" sexuality is such that he cheats as if he were not cheating. It is possible to cheat in a well-established dialogue; as for the intimate monologue of the 1st Physique, it knowingly excludes dialogue and, therefore, cheating. The sex of the "proprietor" is not a matter of two, but of him alone, so no matter how many partners there are, the main thing is that there is no cheating on oneself, the beloved. 

* * * 

Sensory behemothness greatly affects the tastes of the 1st Physicist. Tastes, it is said, are not debatable, often and correctly said, but argued incessantly at the same time. By and large, however, there are really three basic kinds of taste, really almost irreconcilable, the differences between which are due to the position of the Physicist on the first three rungs of the functional hierarchy. Therefore, the further reference to the bad taste of the 1st Physique should not be taken literally. It is simply not she, but the two Physicists below her, who act as trendsetters today. Here is the main source of both subjectivism of evaluations in general, and the division into bad and good taste, in particular. 

As for the tastes of the 1st Physicist, due to her sensory thick-skinnedness, she likes bright, striking colors, but is poor at distinguishing halftones and shades. Has a predilection for coarse, heavy, spicy food. Not good with the 1st Physicist's hearing. I will not say that a bear necessarily stepped on her ear, but she clearly gives preference to the loudest and simplest sound. She is attracted to tart, nasal smells, because the 1st Physicist simply does not feel any other, more subtle ones. 

A predilection for a certain kind of clothing makes the figure of the "proprietor" noticeable from afar. He likes expensive, catchy fabrics and furs, a puffy silhouette that emphasizes his already powerful forms. He knows no measure for the trimmings of a dress, whether it is really expensive or frivolous: a brooch as big as his fist, a chain or a ring as thick as a finger... To summarize, we can say that the style of the 1st Physicist's clothes is close (no offense, please) to the style of the Mafiosi, as they are usually portrayed in the world's movies. 

Admittedly, the taste of the "proprietor" is crude. But the matter is not hopeless. Serious lessons can develop and refine the taste of the "proprietor. There are many opera singers with the first physics who have sharpened their hearing by long studies (Chaliapin), many artists with the first physics perfectly distinguish shades of colors (Michelangelo), Dumas father, despite his first physics, was recognized by connoisseurs of cooking as the most refined gourmand. So, although the problem of the "proprietor's bad taste" is indeed not far-fetched, it is solvable, one only needs to make an effort. 

* * * 

It is possible to guess in a child "the proprietor" quite early. If in kindergarten or at the yard sandpit a child whose neighbor stole a toy, silently, without any prior negotiation, punches the offender in the ear, then parents can be congratulated: their child has the 1st Physics. 

The explanation of the mechanism of this prediction is very simple. The first function in conflicts is the main and first exposed weapon. Therefore, naturally, the first impulse of the "proprietor" in the event of a clash is to try to influence events by force. Especially often children resort to them, since they, not yet aware of the social taboo against violence, do not consider it necessary to restrain their first and quite natural impulse. 

With time upbringing usually subdues such impulses, and the child with the 1st Physique more often just compensates them by imitating an attack or only clenching his fists. The latter option as a reflex is kept by the "proprietor" until the end of days. 

The attitude toward violence as a litmus test for determining the position of Physics on the rungs of the functional hierarchy is only good for a child's time. Later it becomes the object of close attention of such a no-nonsense sphere as criminal law, under whose protection is precisely the physical layer of life. 

Therefore, I don't want to scare anyone: neither the "owner" himself, nor those around him, but the owner of the 1st Physics is one of the most criminogenic category of citizens. This does not mean that the other Physicists are obviously clean before the law, and the "proprietor" has been in jail since the cradle. Not at all. Much in the fate of the "proprietor" depends on the order of the other functions, the upbringing, the effectiveness of law enforcement, the economic model of society and much more. Still, the thesis of increased criminogenicity of the 1st Physics remains in force. Because only in her, when a problem arises, unconscious impulse instantly provokes temptation to solve it through illegal actions. And not always external and internal brakes are strong enough to overcome such temptation. 

The impulsive propensity for violence is well illustrated by one harmless example from the lives of both Dumas. One day, as Dumas father was sitting at work, little Dumas son unwittingly interrupted her with his loud crying; Dumas father's reaction was quite in the spirit of the 1st Physique - he silently took his son by the scruff of the neck and threw him on the bed. Of course, this action of the writer was not subject to trial, but it is a good illustration of the thesis about the impulsive tendency of the 1st Physique to violence. The impulsiveness of this propensity is indicated by an even less beautiful episode in the life of Alexander I. One contemporary of the tsar described the parade of the Guards after his return from the campaign: "At last the emperor appeared, leading the Guards division, on a glorious red horse, with naked sword, which he was about to put down before the empress... We admired him. But at that very minute a man ran across the street almost in front of his horse. The emperor gave the spurs to his horse and rushed at the fleeing man with his bare sword. The police took the man in their sticks. We could not believe our own eyes and turned away, ashamed of the king we loved. I involuntarily recalled the cat converted to beauty, which, however, could not see a mouse without rushing at it." 

The cruelty and selfishness of the First Function has already been mentioned before. Both of these qualities, needless to say, are fully intrinsic to the 1st Function. It is easier for her to kill, rape, rob, and steal than for anyone else. But "easier," of course, does not mean to commit such a thing. The vast majority of "proprietors" are law-abiding and are not a danger to others. Moreover, we want to bow low and sincerely sympathize with the lawabiding "proprietors" for their almost daily feat of overcoming themselves, for the chronic violence against the most powerful side of their nature. Agree, without much hope of success to insist, persuade, ask, where everything seems to be simple, easy and quickly solved by a single blow of the fist - is not it torture? 

* * * 

The "proprietor" is the first victim of all kinds of financial scams, lotteries, gambling, etc. He is a monstrously gambler, and the prospect of instant, effortless enrichment has an almost magical power over him. The "proprietor's" temptation to pump up his pocket muscles prevails over all the arguments of reason, which is understandable, since his Physics, by definition, dominates Logic, as well as all other functions. Of course, depending on the degree of trust in Logic, the "proprietor's" involvement in financial mirage projects is different. But, if at the 1st Physics Logic is the 4th, then the example of Balzac, who all his life rushed through with fantastic projects of instant monstrous enrichment, will prove to be not yet the most curiosity. 

While he does not usually take the pains and troubles of others to heart, the "proprietor" is more acutely affected by his own property and physical losses than anyone else. Even minor blows to Physics, the pillar of his personality, are often perceived by him as almost the death of the universe. I think that mass suicides during stock market crashes are committed for the most part by the 1st Physicist. In any case, other Physicists are less serious about money. 

What to say about stock market crashes? Even a slight cold smears the "proprietor" on the wall, sometimes driving him to hysterics. From the outside and in the opinion of other Physicists, such a heightened reaction to a simple ailment is a theater, a game, a provocation in order to cause pity. But in reality it is not. The discovery of a weakness, a defect in the strongest and best side of one's nature is a tragedy for anyone. In the case of the "proprietor," this side is Physics, and so natural are his excessive, to the outside eye, worries about minor ailments. 

Here again, I would like to express my most sincere and warmest sympathy to the "proprietor. After all, it is Physics, like no other function, that is subject to the blows of the fast-flowing time. There are no options. Years can add intelligence, keep intact the strength of mind and freshness of feelings, but there is no case when they have added or saved someone's youth, beauty, strength, health. Therefore, the tragic evolution of the "proprietor," associated with the destruction of his support, from an optimist and merry man to an irritable, gloomy, apocalyptically looking at the world, is almost inevitable. Chekhov's example here is quite illustrative. Under the weight of aging and the growing tuberculosis process, he quickly worked his way up from the splashing, cheerful Antosha Chekhonte to the classical singer of twilight and melancholy; without the brake of the 3rd Emotion, which prevented Chekhov from freely crying out the terror that filled him, Chekhov's plays would be comparable in tone to the darkest Shakespearian tragedies. 

* * * 

Physics 1 is, to put it mildly, somewhat stingy. I cannot judge how far her stinginess can go in each individual case. There is no norm here, the range is enormous: from hardly noticeable prudence to truly pathological greed. In any case, any "proprietor" is a complete materialist, knowing better than anyone his benefits and the value of money. President Reagan's famous phrase about the free school lunch program-"there is no such thing as free lunch"-expresses perfectly the sober, purely pragmatic view of the problem of material mutual aid that is characteristic of the 1st Physics. 

Although the "proprietor" is stingy, he is not the kind of person who is willing to work endlessly to replenish his coffers. The personal economic credo of the 1st Physicist can be formulated as follows: the main goal is to reach 120-130% of the level of well-being of the social group to which one belongs. That is, the 1st Physicist wants to live a little better than others, and the percentage of property excess should correspond to the percentage of self-perception of one's physical excess. But then, stop. Having achieved an external result adequate to the inner feeling, the 1st Physics thereby quenches its thirst for money and willingly switches its time and energy to processional functions, so that the "proprietor", being neither ascetic nor altruistic, at the same time has not infinite but rather clearly defined limits of material needs. 

I will allow myself, in this connection, a little advice to parents of children with the 1st Physique. If you want to see your child harmoniously developed, try to make it feel somewhat more well-off than its peers. A child does not need much, and the effect of such feeding can be huge. A well-fed child, having received adequate property results, more quickly and willingly switch to studies in non-material spheres. On children, I think, at all should not save. And in the case of the 1st Physics such economy is simply dangerous, the material hunger will completely stifle in the child all other needs and, not exclude, will lead to offenses. 

A splendid example of an early solution to the problems of raising the 1st Physique is Goethe's childhood. The poet was well aware of his dependence on the level of wealth and once half-jokingly remarked that if he had been born in England, he would not have been born without an annual income of 6,000 pounds. Although Goethe himself could not complain - he was born into one of the richest families of Frankfurt. But the luck of Goethe was not in this, but that his parents did not spare money on him. Feeling wealthy enough, the boy turned to mastering all kinds of book wisdom, including those related to the painful for him Logic, with time he markedly excelled in them and became not just a great German poet, scientist, administrator, but, above all, the standard of a harmonious personality. 

A strict individualist in everyday life, the "proprietor" remains so in his attitude to the economic model of society. In the usual terms of political economy, the "proprietor" is a born "liberal. He is an unquestioning supporter of private property, and a small fan of encouraging all kinds of social programs. When General Pinochet chose as his motto "Chile is a country of owners, not proletarians," he was expressing not so much the economic views instilled in him, as his personal sense of what was right with the economy. And it was these feelings that were successfully projected onto the economic mechanism of the country during Pinochet's reign. 

Even when the 1st Physicist becomes at the helm of a state with a system that deliberately does not allow private initiative and "social injustice," it remains itself. The difference is that in this case the concern for the poor turns into pure demagogy, and the encouragement of private initiative is replaced by a more than lenient attitude to theft (Brezhnev). 

If we are talking about the political face of the 1st Physicist, it is necessary to say that the "proprietor" is also a born "hawk", which becomes quite understandable if we take into account his psychophysical properties. Only for the "proprietor" it is natural to give preference to force methods over all others in solving arising political problems. And, in addition, only the 1st Physics entirely identifies the power of a country with the volume of its military muscles, pumped up as much as possible with excess. 

In light of this, I think the reader will understand the programmed nature of the absentee militaristic duel between Reagan and Brezhnev. Since both politicians had 1st Physics, the arms race during their reign was fatally predetermined. 

When Reagan was succeeded as president by Bush, in the absence of formal change (Reagan was succeeded by a fellow president and vice-president), there was a radical shift in priorities. Bush, with his 1st Logic, identified the power of the state no longer with the amount of weapons, but with the level of education, and made appropriate corrections in government programs. So, in politics, too, while the other components are identical, the difference in the order of the functions of its figures will inevitably predetermine the change of means and reference points. 

* * * 

"The "proprietor" is the kind of person who, as Goethe said in the mouth of Faust, "only takes things seriously. Therefore, one more noticeable mark of the 1st Physique from childhood is an unaccountable, but obvious craving for handicrafts, for subject pursuits. The child-"proprietor" seeks to try everything, to pass through their hands different, primarily domestic, crafts. Easily grasping the essence of the case, he quickly confident movements early enough to begin to reproduce even a relatively complex operation. In short, the 1st Physicist from childhood has no fear or problems related to crafts and mechanics. 

At the same time, the "proprietor" cannot be called a "workaholic", a gambling worker who feels pleasure from work as such, regardless of the result. The processiveness of labor contradicts the 1st Physicist - she is economical, calculating and does not hurry to work too hard for vague goals or inadequate rewards. 

A small but expressive feature of the production psychology of the 1st Physicist can be considered the fact that she is not opposed to the conveyor belt. She copes with work on the conveyor belt without internal opposition and tension: it gives a quick visible result, so necessary for the 1st Physicist, and the monotony of labor is not a burden for her - as long as she gets paid (another result). 

* * * 

Naturally, sport is among the main activities and interests of the 1st Physics. After all, it is sport, as it seems, that realizes the physical beginning in its purest form. And he in whom it is strong, cannot but try to test himself in this field. 

However, the "proprietor" accepts the sport not unconditionally, and not entirely, but under his, a certain position of Physics, angle of view, with certain sympathies and preferences. Internally, the closest thing to the 1st Physique is bodybuilding. The obvious orientation of body-building on the dispute - who will show more abundance and relief of flesh - is extremely appealing to the experiencing the same mental sensations of the "proprietor". 

The 1st Physicist also likes sports martial arts, in which she is attracted to the characteristic for martial arts bias not so much on the process of struggle, but on the result so dear to his heart. The "proprietor" is somewhat less sympathetic to collective games and does not find any place in them comfortable. In fact, he feels at ease only in the first line of attack, because in the collective game the place of the attacker is the only one where the "proprietor's" passion for effectiveness can be quite satisfied. 

Although it seems that sport is specifically designed for the 1st Physics, it does not always succeed on this path. And there are good internal reasons for that. First, the "proprietor" has a rather poorly developed reaction, and it seems that the impulse runs somewhat slower along the muscles of the 1st Physicist than it does in other Physicists. Therefore, no matter how attractive, say, fencing or table tennis are for the "proprietor", he cannot expect much success here. 

Second, the failures in the sport of 1st Physics are due to the tardiness and short-termism of what I for myself call "dynamic prediction. In short, dynamic prediction is the prediction of the consequences of a particular movement in a particular environment and under certain rules. 

To make it clear, I will give you an example of the movement of a person in a street crowd. Once in it, a person, judging from the outside, moves freely and thoughtlessly, but in reality this is not so. All the way from the starting point to the end point, the pedestrian, in order not to collide with others and at the same time not to turn his movement into endless wandering, is engaged in unconscious prediction of the optimal route, where, besides his own data, the dimensions, speed and direction of movement of others are considered, as well as unwritten, but existing for pedestrians in any country rule of the preferential side of movement. In a word, several hypothetical maps of a situation for a step, for two, for three ahead are constantly formed in human subconsciousness taking into account all conditions. Thus, even such a simple action as movement in a crowd is controlled by an internal computer engaged in dynamic prediction, and, judging by collisions and hiccups occurring in this situation, prediction of this computer, depending on the position of Physics on the steps of functional hierarchy, may be different and quite far from the ideal. 

As for the dependence of the dynamic prediction on the order of functions, I will try to explain its mechanism on another example, which can become a good household test in Physics on occasion. We are talking about such a simple action as pouring liquid into a vessel. So, the 3rd Physique usually under-pours because her prediction, out of caution and insecurity, is ahead of the action. The 2nd Physics, by the custom of the Second Functions, is normative, its prediction is adequate to the action, so the level of liquid it pours in always corresponds to the limiting risk. The 1st Physics, on the other hand, often overflows, since its prediction is careless and lags behind the action. 

Now that the meaning of "dynamic forecasting" is clear to the reader, it is easy to guess why a late and short-term forecast has a negative impact on the sporting career of the "proprietor": interception play, anticipation, and accurate passing are more difficult for him than for anyone else. 

However, the consequences of dynamic prediction errors in the 1st Physicist are much more serious than simple failures in sports. The fact is that the sensory behemoth of the "proprietor" from the beginning is not conducive to an objective perception of the external environment, including the dangers associated with it. And its combination with delayed dynamic prognosis, in general, makes the 1st Physicist a permanent patient of hospitals and trauma centers. It is as if by fate itself is destined to receive and inflict trauma. 

One gets the impression that the "proprietor's" dynamic prediction mechanism is not to say that it tends to be wrong, but that it is just mostly in a disconnected state. I happened to observe such a scene. A good acquaintance of mine with the 1st Physics once took it upon himself to pull a piece of rebar from a pile of construction debris for his household needs. The rebar did not yield, my acquaintance, irritated, increased his efforts and, watching him, the more I, a bystander, was imbued with the expectation of disaster. My friend was pulling without looking back and obviously without thinking about where his elbow would be if the armature suddenly gave way, i.e. there was no dynamic forecast at all. Of course, it ended the way it was supposed to end: the rebar suddenly gave way, and my elbow crashed into the stacked masonry behind. 

If we multiply all these frightening circumstances by the quite natural passion for acquiring all kinds of unsafe mechanisms and machines (cars, for example), then the suicidal and traumatic background in which the life of the 1st Physicist takes place will appear even more clearly.